Effective 01 August 2020, we are excited to announce that Global IP Attorneys has partnered with Helios IP to form an online resource for IP practitioners to collaborate on IP practice and procedures.

In addition to the Global IP Attorneys directory, you'll also find articles, news, events and job postings. Plus a new online forum for practical "how to" Q&As and discussions on IP best practices.


Trademark: assessment of distinctive character of BIO-INSECT Shocker

The word trademark BIO-INSECT Shocker was applied for on 26/11/2015 and registered on 10/03/2016 as an EUTM for goods in Classes 1 (biocidal products for manufacture; chemical preparations for the manufacture of biocides; chemical additives for insecticides), 5 (including products for destroying vermin, parasiticides; insecticides; biocides; insecticide preparations) and 31.
The registration was later challenged, and its invalidity sought based on the grounds of descriptiveness and deceptiveness.
The General Court of the European Union finally had to assess whether the trademarkmark BIO-INSECT Shocker was invalid and should be cancelled or not. The judgement was rendered on May 13, 2020
The Court finds that the meaning of the term ‘Shocker’ refers to something shocking and does not specifically refer to killing or repelling. Therefore, the link between the word ‘shocker’ and the insect-repellent goods is not direct and strong enough to allow the public, without any further consideration, to immediately understand this as a description of the contested goods or their characteristics.
We learn that in an invalidity action, the evidence for the descriptive character of a mark must relate to the time of the application is filed.
In this case, the evidence submitted by the invalidity applicant was insufficient to prove the general use of the word ‘shocker’ for insect-repellent goods at the date of the filing of the trademark application.
The term ‘bio’ refers, generally speaking, to the idea of respect for the environment, the use of natural materials, or organic products.
The use of the term ‘bio’ on biocidal goods for which the contested mark is registered establishes a sufficiently serious risk of misleading the consumer as to the purpose of the contested goods, namely that they serve to destroy or prevent pests.
The possibility of a non-misleading use of the mark, even if it is established, is unable to overcome the deceptive character of the sign. Indeed, a deceptive sign must be refused even though it is not used in a deceptive way,
The contested mark was misleading for goods in Classes 1 and 5 identified as biocidal products. The mark is to be annulled as far as those goods and remain for the others.
Anne DESMOUSSEAUX, Founding Partner
Source: 13/05/2020, T 86/19, BIO-INSECT Shocker, EU:T:2020:199

Published on July 11 2020 by ALATIS IP.

DC Lawyers - Sociedade de Advogados, RL.

Luanda - Angola

MacMillan's Intellectual Property Attorneys Ltd

Mahe - Seychelles

IP Moment Services

New Delhi - India


Rotterdam - Netherlands

JMB Davis Ben-David

Jerusalem - Israel

Levi & Spencer

Festac Town,Lagos, - Nigeria

IPSOL Intellectual Property Agency Limited

Macau - Macau

Mikijelj Jankovic & Bogdanovic

Belgrade - Serbia

Orbis IP & Law

Bursa - Turkey

Infini Juridique

New Dehli - India

IP Boutique

Bucharest - Romania

DCLaw - Litigation and Intellectual Property Attorneys in Metro Manila, PH

Makati, Metro Manila - Philippines

Vemma Consult Attorneys

Dar es Salaam - Tanzania

Spoor & Fisher

Pretoria - South Africa

Cho and Partners

Seoul - South Korea

Goytia & Associates

Buenos Aires - Argentina

LOVEN Patents & Trademarks

Lincoln - United Kingdom

Estudio Colmenares & Asociados

Lima - Peru

Luis Elias & Asociados

Caracas - Venezuela

Cabinet Isis

Yaounde - Cameroon

Ratza & Ratza

Bucharest - Romania


Moscow - Russian Federation


Saint-Petersburg - Russian Federation

Wildgen SA

Luxembourg - Luxembourg

InPatent Professionals LLP

Delhi - India

Fairbridges Wertheim Becker

Cape Town - South Africa

Betita Cabilao Casuela Sarmiento

Manila - Philippines

Central LAW Guatemala

Guatemala - Guatemala

Am Badar & Partners

Jakarta - Indonesia

InnoCapture Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd.

Noida - India

Dipl. Eng. Kostadin Tahtadjiev - IP agency Patent and Trademark Attorneys

Sofia - Bulgaria

Akkum, Akkum & Associates LLP

Yaounde - Cameroon

Irin Patent Co.

Sofia - Bulgaria

China Sunbow Law Firm

Shanghai - China

Hammond & Associates

Bucharest - Romania

Dentons Muñoz Zacapa

Tegucigalpa - Honduras

Moeller IP

Buenos Aires - Argentina

Zorin Law Office

Moscow - Russian Federation

YOU ME Patent & Law Firm

Seoul - South Korea

Sipi Law Associates

Kampala - Uganda

MarkMirror Intellectual Property Services

Dubai - United Arab Emirates

Mete Mercan Patent Ltd.

Bursa - Turkey

Cerberus IP

London - United Kingdom

Destek Patent - Your IP partner in Turkey

Istanbul - Turkey

Cabinet Lionel Vial - Saclay IP

Orsay - France

Scanlen & Holderness

Harare - Zimbabwe

Pavlovych and Co.

Kyiv - Ukraine

Dimitri Russo S.R.L.

BARI - Italy

Johansson & Langlois

Santiago - Chile

Deep & Far Attorneys-at-law

Taipei - Taiwan

Z. Manoukian & Partners LLC Patent Office

Yerevan - Armenia

OMC Abogados & Consultores

Lima - Peru

Novopatent International Service, S.C.

Cuernavaca - Mexico

Chandrakant M. Joshi, Indian Patent & Trademark Attorneys

Mumbai - India

J. Varbanov & partners

Sofia - Bulgaria

Vellani & Vellani

Karachi - Pakistan

Mashabela IP Attorneys

Hatfield,Pretoria - South Africa

IPNG Consultants Ltd

Hanoi - Vietnam

Danubia Patent & Law Office LLC

Budapest - Hungary

F.A. Garrick & Co

Lagos - Nigeria

TreeTops & Associates

Dar es Salaam - Tanzania

IP March

Beijing - China

Bufete Mejia & Asociados

San Pedro Sula - Honduras

Pintas Consulting Group Sdn Bhd

Kuala Lumpur - Malaysia

R. Kalashyan & Partners LLC

Yerevan - Armenia


Reykjavík - Iceland

Grischenko & Partners IP

Kyiv - Ukraine

Helios IP

Tampa - United States of America

Borsam Intellectual Property

Shenzhen - China

Masnad Law Firm

Kabul - Afghanistan

WizeCounzel Law Firm

Lagos - Nigeria

David do Nascimento Advogados Associados

São Paulo - Brazil

V&A Law Villaraza and Angangco

Taguig, Manila - Philippines

Solar Law Associates

Bhaktapur - Nepal

Eagar & Associates

Southport - Australia

Beutler Künzi Stutz AG

Bern - Switzerland

Limited Liability Company

Moscow - Russian Federation

Brands Care

Istanbul - Turkey

Smart IP Law Associates

Dhaka , Bangladesh - Bangladesh

BPV TAX & IP ATTORNEY Democratic Republic of CONGO Lawfirm

Kinshasa - Democratic Republic of Congo

Agency of Patent Attorneys KIM & KIM

Bishkek - Kyrgyzstan

Dr. D. Graeser Ltd

Herzelia Pituach - Israel

Cita Citrawinda Noerhadi & Associates

Jakarta - Indonesia


Ulaanbaatar - Mongolia

Ella Cheong LLC

Singapore - Singapore

Calysta NV

Diegem - Belgium

Lext Intellectual Property

Niteroi - Brazil


Madrid - Spain

Judex Law Firm

Pristina - Kosovo

W3IP Law Pty Ltd

Southport - Australia

Stillwaters Law Firm

Lagos - Nigeria

SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan

Manila - Philippines

KTA Advocates

Kampala - Uganda

Calderon & De La Sierra

Mexico City - Mexico

Knightsbridge Patent Attorneys

MELBOURNE - Australia

Producta Ltd

Zagreb - Croatia

Agency of intellectual property "INTELS"

Moscow - Russian Federation

Mikadze Gegetchkori Taktakishvili (MGT)

Tbilisi - Georgia

Alyafi IP GrouP

Beirut - Lebanon

Johnson Bryant

Lagos - Nigeria

Kancelaria Patentowa W.Sojka M.Wroblewski s.c.

Lodz - Poland

O'Conor & Power

Buenos Aires - Argentina


Mexico City - Mexico

IP Villar

Valencia - Spain

Shahid & Alliance, Intellectual Property Law Services, Bangladesh

Dhaka - Bangladesh

Cabinet Achour | IP

Tunis - Tunisia

Schurman Advocaten N.V.

Paramaribo - Suriname

Adiel Solicitors

Ogudu-Lagos - Nigeria

IntellectPol (Intellectual Property - EU, Poland)

Kutno - Poland

Hiroe and Associates Patent Professional Corporation

500-8368 - Gifu - Japan

Henry, Samuelson & Co

Douala - Cameroon

Codex & Co. Intellectual Property

Lahore - Pakistan

Maschietto Maggiore Besseghini

Milano - Italy

Caspian Legal Center

Baku - Azerbaijan

Christopher & Lee Ong

Kuala Lumpur - Malaysia

Castillo Grau

Bogotá, D.C. - Colombia

Gonzalez Villalobos International

Caracas - Venezuela

PWC Legal

Luxembourg - Luxembourg


Paris - France

Oriti Patents - Franco Oriti

Lugano - Switzerland

Ryong-San & Co. Patent and Trademark

Pyongyang - North Korea

M/s Clues & Colleague

Thimphu - Bhutan

Vilage Brazil Intellectual Property

São José do Rio Preto-SP - Brazil

International Law & Corporate Services (Pty) Ltd

Victoria - Seychelles

Patentna pisarna d.o.o.

Ljubljana - Slovenia

Cengiz & Opak Law Office

Istanbul - Turkey

SCP Global Africa IP

Yaoundé - Cameroon

Crane IP Law Firm

Kyiv - Ukraine

Santamarina y Steta

Mexico City - Mexico

Sonoda & Kobayashi Intellectual Property Law

Tokyo - Japan

Jeong, Kim & Lee IP Law Firm

Seoul - South Korea

Markides, Markides & Co., LLC

Nicosia - Cyprus

International Law Company Kodex

Kiev - Ukraine

Petosevic Group

Belgrade - Serbia

J. Ponce Law

Makati CIty - Philippines

JarryIP Intellectual Property Boutique

Santiago - Chile


New Delhi - India

Lexgoal IP Law Office

Beijing - China

Brookes IP

Tunbridge Wells - United Kingdom

NEOVIAQ IP / ICT Solutions sàrl

Weiswampach - Luxembourg

Cajigas & Co.

Panama City - Panama

D&N International

Hanoi - Vietnam

Switch Legal

Collingwood - Australia


Eindhoven - Netherlands

Estrategia Juridica

Bogota - Colombia

SPI Americas

Bogotá - Colombia

Events & Trade Fairs

Events / Trade fairs

Events / Trade fairs